By reading some documentation, it looks it fails because UF are not with python 2.7. It works pretty well on splunk server side with full installation, but not at all when using universal forwarders. : defaultLocalHost:: ibmwebsphere: ibmwebsphere: System errorĪt .ORB.defaultLocalHost(ORB.java:2041) ~Īt .ORB.defaultBootstrapHost(ORB.java:2018) ~Īt .ORB.parseProperties(ORB.java:2146) ~Īt .ORB.orbParameters(ORB.java:1347) ~Īt .ORB.set_parameters(ORB.java:1295) ~Īt .ORB.set_parameters(ORB.java:1695) ~Īt .init(ORB. Hi, I am trying to monitor java instances using jmxta at Splunk. Reason- defaultLocalHost:: ibmwebsphere: ibmwebsphere: System error This may be a possibly related thread to the issue I'm experiencing with VirtualMachine.attach(). -22697 ERROR - Failed to make connection with JMX server. Do you have a python 2. I don't think I can use SOAP or another HTTP-based protocol that may use more dedicated ports because I don't necessarily have an HTTP or SOAP server running on every Java server (but let me know if this is possible in some other way). Can you get the App working correctly on a single standalone Splunk instance Perhaps you have not set up your forwarding correctly. I did try to specify the ports using the full service URL (service:jmx:rmi://(ip4):(port1)/jndi/rmi://(ip4):(port2)), but it did not make a difference, even with those ports open on the firewall (random ports were still being used and blocked). I can't use RMI from the Splunk server to the Java server because we have firewalls in place and RMI uses random ports every time. Navigate to SPLUNKHOME/etc/apps/SplunkTAjmx/bin/javaconst.py 2. I need to get this to work for critical Java process monitoring. So what is the equivalent for the "-F" option to VirtualMachine.attach() in Java code? jstack -F -l 1267Īttaching to process ID 1267, please wait. The -F option can be used when the target process is not respondingīut when I use the -F option. jstack -l 1267ġ267: Unable to open socket file: target process not responding or HotSpot VM not loaded I actually get a similar error when I attempt to use the jstack utility installed in my home directory with the JDK. Dallimore September 2012 - OVERVIEW This SPLUNK app provides the means to : connect to any local or remote JVMs JMX server, either via the remote JMX interface,attaching to a local JVM process or using an MX4J HTTP based connector. So it is probably this line within .getURLForPid() that is causing this error: // attach to the target applicationįinal VirtualMachine vm = VirtualMachine.attach(String.valueOf(pid)) Welcome to SPLUNK 4 JMX v1.5.7 by Damien T. I also had to remove tools-win.jar from that directory, as it kept trying to use Windows Process Attachment even though I'm on Linux.Įven with these changes, though, I keep getting the following error message in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/SPLUNK4JMX/logs/splunk4jmx.log: 21:40:30,621 ERROR host=, jmxServiceURL=, jmxport=0, jvmDescription=(my description), processID=1267,systemErrorMessage="Unable to open socket file: target process not responding or HotSpot VM not loaded" The process ID is being successfully retrieved using a custom script, and I installed the JDK into my home directory on the same target server as the JRE so that I could place libattach.so in $JAVA_HOME/lib/amd64 and, just to be safe, to copy the same exact Java version (Java 6 Update 30) of tools.jar from $HOME/jdk1.6.0_30/lib/tools.jar to $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/SPLUNK4JMX/bin/lib/tools-lin.jar. I have installed Splunk For JMX 1.5.7 as an app into the splunk universal forwarder directory on a virtualized CentOS 6.2 server (VMWare 4.1.x), and have configured the app to use local process attachment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |